The interpretation of the extract from the novel “To Kill a Mockingbird”. The extract is taken from the novel by Nelly Harper Lee. She is an American novelist known for her 1960 Pulitzer Prize-winning novel To Kill a Mockingbird, which deals with the issues of racism that she observed as a child in her hometown of Monroeville, Alabama. The plot and characters are loosely based on the author's observations of her family and neighbors, as well as on an event that occurred near her hometown in 1936, when she was 10 years old. Her novel is devoted to story of Tom Robinson, a Negro, who was charged with raping a white girl. Atticus Finch, an experienced lawyer, tried to prove the innocence of the Robison. But the jury announced a sentence that Robinson was guilty. Harper Lee places the action into that period, 60 years after slavery prohibition. In this historical period many public freedoms and human rights were proclaimed, but not executed. Publicity still couldn’t bear, that the black were considered equal by courts. The main problems raised by the author are an issue of justice and race of discrimination. The author leads us to comprehension that each and every human should be treated honestly, independently of his social status, education or color of skin. It is a narrative with parts of monologue. The narrative is in the first person. It is a daughter of Atticus. It made the story more emotional. She noticed a lot of details which were unusual for Atticus in his usually life. (Atticus did something I never saw him do before or since, in public or in private: he unbuttoned his vest, unbuttoned his collar, loosened his tie, and took off his coat. He never loosened a scrap of his clothing until he undressed at bedtime, and to Jem and me, this was the equivalent of him standing before us stark naked). Her notes described the emotions and feelings of her father, his changing condition during the process of the trial. Thanks to notes of Atticus’ daughter the general tone of the extract is emotion with elements of ironic. I think that if the story were written from the point of view of Atticus or the author, the story would lose its objectivity, emotionality. The author focuses the Atticus’s speech in direct form. Atticus's words have more effect on the reader in this form. It creates atmosphere of the court in reader's room. We may say that the general atmosphere of this extract is tense. The author keeps the reader in suspense till the end. In this place Harper Lee used gradation, perhaps in order to all our emotions strained to the limit. The readers think that the Negro is innocent. But the author uses the effect of defeated expectancy. In my opinion, the climax in this text is the verdict of the jury. Every “guilty” from jury destroys reader’s hope for justice. Looking back in the past, the author wished to convey that all men are created equal. In this extract Atticus said that people think with stereotypes. All Negroes lie, all Negroes are basically immoral beings, all Negro men are not to be trusted around the woman. But we see that the reality can be the exact opposite of it. The author used parallel constructions to emphasize how people can be wrong, when they generalize people with one color skin. The author used the publicistic style. The publicistic style is used in public speeches and printed public works which are addressed to a broad audience and devoted to important social or political events, public problems of cultural or moral character. The general aim of the publicist style is to exert influence on public opinion, to convince the reader or the listener that the interpretation given by the writer or the speaker is the only correct one and to cause him to accept the point of view expressed in the speech, essay or article not merely by logical argumentation, but by emotional appeal as well. The publicist style has spoken varieties, in particular, the oratorical sub-style. This style is evident in the speeches of counsel and judges in courts of law. The typical features of the spoken variety of speech present in this extract are direct address to the audience ( Gentlemen! ) and features of colloquial style such as asking the audience questions when the barrister attempts to reach closer contact. The author uses colloquial words and phrase such as Negro, stupid and evil, In the name of God. The author uses several stylistic devices. We may see how skillfully Harper Lee creates the speech of Atticus. So the text has a lot of repetitions (some people would have us believe – some people are smarter than others, some people have more opportunity, some people make more money than others, some ladies make better cakes than others – some people are born gifted beyond the normal scope of most men.). Repetitions and parallel constructions make the speech of the lawyer more persuasive and clearer for the jury. The stylistic devices are determined by the conditions of communication. Atticus assures the jury with the help of gradation and antithesis that the case is simple (…this case is not a difficult one, it requires no minute sifting of complicated facts, but it does require you to be sure beyond all reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the defendant. This case should never have come to trial). The author uses chiasmus and change the sequence of elements in two parallel lines of words. The author thereby draws the reader's attention to the pressing problem. (A court is only as sound as its jury, and a jury is only as sound as sound as the men who make it up). This phrase appears as instruction to the jury. They can change not only the fate of one man, but the whole court system. The author combines several stylistic devices. He sums it up using simile with allusion (this case is as simple as black and white). Atticus says about the absurdity of the case by repetition with antithesis “She tempted a Negro. She was white, and she tempted a Negro”. The epithets and similes were used to description the author’s attitude. Epithets convey his emotions. (Judge tailor’s voice … was tiny). It can express the doubt of the judge. The author used syntactical parallelism which accompanied by anaphora (some people are smarter than others, some people have more opportunity, some man make more money than others, some ladies make better cakes than others – some people are born gifted beyond the normal scope of most men). And in the end we may say that the story with Tom Robinson gives us ground for thinking. Harper Lee exposes hypocrisy of democratic society in this historical period. The idea of the fight between justice and injustice in this world it is a well-trodden idea. But sometimes it is important for people anew read about this problem. We should to see injustice in order to know, how valuable justice is.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for Contacting Us.